Believe, what the such can be? - I trust.
(They already played "trust-not-trust".) - And what at the daddy grey eyes, at mum grey eyes, and at the son black, trust? -
Not. I do not trust.
Correctly do not trust. And what the grasshopper hears feet, trust? - I trust.
And what there are such statements, what they cannot neither be proved, nor to deny, - trust? - I trust! - the clear head. And
an example can result? - I can. "God has created all". You will prove Nothing.
Hm... And what God exists, trust? - I trust.
And I here - was not present... A propos: I AT ALL do not remember those questions which were set by it to me twenty
years ago when mum has led me to it on testing. At me absolute memory (there is a perfect ear, and at me - absolute
memory). I remember all. I remember that sessions was four. I remember, how mum has been dressed during each of these
sessions, and of that time brown shlafrok senseja (with a stain from ice-cream on the left cuff) too I remember perfectly. Dates
I remember, and corresponding days of week I remember, and weather I remember - air temperature, atmospheric pressure,
speed of a wind... And here questions I do not remember. And at all I do not remember the answers.
... Perhaps, he searches gedelevskie for questions (comes to to me sometimes mind) - those questions which it is
impossible to answer "yes", "is not present", without having sinned thus against true? Doubtfully. But even if he and really
searches for them, - what for?. He constantly complains that it does not have not enough questions. But it does not set some
For example, a great question of any present: "Why - I?" The question - a cry. All ours ojkumena costs on it, as Petersburg
Difficultly enough, the truth to imagine a context, in which vstraiva - etsja this question. But what to it business to a context?.
"... We pass now in a new phase of culture in which not confirming statements, and the new, more deeply formulated
questions" will be the answer to questions. It was written by V.V. Nalimov in the philosophical treatise "Rope-walker". I do
not know, I do not know. For some reason all modern philosophers leave at me impression of irresponsible chatterers. Nika -
which solidity. Any, whether understand, thoroughness. And even spetster - minologija (the tested weapon of classics) does
not help them - the protest sensation only increases that of you, among other things, also make a fool. Something
kashpirovskoe is suddenly found out in the serious text, something chumakovskoe...
... To Whom does it belong? - It all the same is not present.
To whom will it belong? - Who the first will come.
So. The widely-read boy. It too reads now and then Konan Doyle. "A ceremony of the house Mesgrejvov", transfer
D.Livshits. But quotes it is inexact. It was necessary: "to The one who has left" and "to The one who will come"...
In what month it was? - In summer month.